Under FIPPA Section 13(2)(a), a public body must not refuse to
disclose factual material. The redacted pages in question are
being used to mask the internal directive to omit factual, 34-year-
old metadata from a final Clinical Opinion in order to make that
Opinion appear contemporary and relevant to a modern workplace
environment.

Evidence of Alteration and Misuse of FIPPA Exemptions: |
have included five attachments that demonstrate a closed logical
loop of this timeline manipulation. WorkSafeBC cannot claim
these redactions protect standard internal deliberations when the
surrounding documents prove they are actively scrubbing
historical dates from the official record.

. Attachment 1 (Evidence of Knowledge): Draft notes
showing the Advisor possessed and acknowledged noise
records dating back to 1991 and 1992.

. Attachments 2 & 3 (The Source Material): The original 1991
BC Ferry noise record and the 1992 VGH "Decwriter" printer
memo used as benchmarks for a modern OMC1 server room
environment.

. Attachments 4 & 5 (The Execution of Alteration): The final
sanitized Clinical Opinion and references page where the
1991 and 1992 dates have been entirely scrubbed from the
record, creating a manufactured illusion of contemporary data.

The severing of pages 24—34 is not protecting personal privacy or
legitimate policy advice; it is shielding a material alteration of
evidence. This matter is also currently part of an active
professional conduct investigation (CHCPBC Case ID: 2026-057).

| request that the OIPC review the unredacted versions of these
specific pages and compel WorkSafeBC to release them, as the
withheld information is strictly factual material demonstrating the
origin and manipulation of the data used against my claim.

Thank you for your time and prompt attention to this matter.

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=7 1cd554d90&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f: 1866473152914 189205&simpl=msg-f: 18664731529141892... 3/5