computer processing area of a large hospital." She cited no dates for these comparison data sets in the final published report. She dismissed the entire incident as inconsistent with acoustic trauma and acoustic shock, relying on the employer's post-incident noise survey conducted on March 6, 2026 โ six weeks after the injury occurred, by which time corrective action may have been taken, and in any case measuring ambient averages rather than the cyclic peak-load resonance that the worker's own telemetry had captured at the time of injury. Active Omission of Clinical and Telemetry Data The worker submitted a detailed Acoustic Trauma Brief to the Board, complete with frequency-specific on-site telemetry data, calibration records, and spatial acoustic analysis. The Advisor's Clinical Opinion actively ignored or misrepresented every quantified data point: e 328 Hz Resonance: The worker's submitted telemetry identified a quantified mechanical resonance spike at exactly 328 Hz โ a frequency in the range known to stimulate tensor tympani muscle activation. The Advisor made no reference to frequency-specific resonance data. The acoustic brief, with its charts and calibration records, is absent from the clinical analysis. e Tonic Tensor Tympani Syndrome (TTTS): The worker documented the onset of TTTS โ a Clinically recognized condition in which the tensor tympani muscle of the middle ear goes into sustained spasm in response to acoustic irritation. TTTS produces exactly the symptom profile the worker presented: unilateral ear pain, fullness, sensitivity to sound, and autonomic dysregulation. The Advisor excluded any clinical engagement with TTTS from her review. e Sleep Architecture Disruption: The worker's independently operated CozZie Glow sleep laboratory โ a Raspberry Pi-based data logging and video capture system built specifically to document this injury โ recorded 127 motion-detection events in a single night during the acute phase, including cyclic nocturnal motor spasms consistent with tensor tympani reflex arcs. This footage was submitted to WorkSafeBC. It was not referenced in the Clinical Opinion. e Autistic Neurology: The worker is awaiting formal autism diagnosis (self-identified, assessment pending). Autistic nervous systems process sensory input differently, with significantly lower thresholds for sensory overload and significantly higher physiological consequences from sustained acoustic irritation at specific frequencies. The Advisor was aware of the worker's documented sensitivity to noise. She chose to deploy this as evidence of a pre-existing non-occupational condition rather than as context for understanding why a 328 Hz resonance in a classroom produced the documented clinical sequelae. The Pre-Existing Scapegoat โ And Its Misapplication The Advisor's conclusion states: "The main driving factors of the worker's complaints are likely his pre-existing and non-occupational conditions of migraines and noise sensitivity, rather than the incident itself.โ This conclusion requires surgical examination.