Processing document โ€” OCR in progressโ€ฆ
May take a minute for large PDFs.
Records: 1114 EMPLOYER 62 WORKSAFE 102 MEDICAL 21 LEGAL 16 INTERNAL 656 FOI 42 PERSONAL 215 ๐Ÿ“ MARK'S DOC 1113 ๐Ÿ“ GEORGINA'S DOC 1 โญ 102 | 2026-07-04 12:56
โ† Back ๐Ÿ“ MARK'S DOC
๐Ÿ”— Linked Evidence
The_Pang_Formula โ€” p.5
๐Ÿ“„ The Pang Formula | p.5
๐Ÿ“ Extracted Text (OCR)
computer processing area of a large hospital." She cited no dates for these comparison data
sets in the final published report.

She dismissed the entire incident as inconsistent with acoustic trauma and acoustic shock,
relying on the employer's post-incident noise survey conducted on March 6, 2026 โ€” six
weeks after the injury occurred, by which time corrective action may have been taken, and in
any case measuring ambient averages rather than the cyclic peak-load resonance that the
worker's own telemetry had captured at the time of injury.

Active Omission of Clinical and Telemetry Data

The worker submitted a detailed Acoustic Trauma Brief to the Board, complete with
frequency-specific on-site telemetry data, calibration records, and spatial acoustic analysis.
The Advisor's Clinical Opinion actively ignored or misrepresented every quantified data
point:

e 328 Hz Resonance: The worker's submitted telemetry identified a quantified
mechanical resonance spike at exactly 328 Hz โ€” a frequency in the range known to
stimulate tensor tympani muscle activation. The Advisor made no reference to
frequency-specific resonance data. The acoustic brief, with its charts and calibration
records, is absent from the clinical analysis.

e Tonic Tensor Tympani Syndrome (TTTS): The worker documented the onset of
TTTS โ€” a Clinically recognized condition in which the tensor tympani muscle of the
middle ear goes into sustained spasm in response to acoustic irritation. TTTS
produces exactly the symptom profile the worker presented: unilateral ear pain,
fullness, sensitivity to sound, and autonomic dysregulation. The Advisor excluded
any clinical engagement with TTTS from her review.

e Sleep Architecture Disruption: The worker's independently operated CozZie Glow
sleep laboratory โ€” a Raspberry Pi-based data logging and video capture system
built specifically to document this injury โ€” recorded 127 motion-detection events in a
single night during the acute phase, including cyclic nocturnal motor spasms
consistent with tensor tympani reflex arcs. This footage was submitted to
WorkSafeBC. It was not referenced in the Clinical Opinion.

e Autistic Neurology: The worker is awaiting formal autism diagnosis (self-identified,
assessment pending). Autistic nervous systems process sensory input differently,
with significantly lower thresholds for sensory overload and significantly higher
physiological consequences from sustained acoustic irritation at specific frequencies.
The Advisor was aware of the worker's documented sensitivity to noise. She chose to
deploy this as evidence of a pre-existing non-occupational condition rather than as
context for understanding why a 328 Hz resonance in a classroom produced the
documented clinical sequelae.

The Pre-Existing Scapegoat โ€” And Its Misapplication

The Advisor's conclusion states: "The main driving factors of the worker's complaints are
likely his pre-existing and non-occupational conditions of migraines and noise sensitivity,
rather than the incident itself.โ€ This conclusion requires surgical examination.