WORKING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE

Memo
(continued)

Worker last name First name Middle initial WorkSafeBC claim number
HOLAND MARK 42647461

A Warning: External sender

Be alert. This email is not from within our organization. Don’t click links or
attachments unless you trust the sender and know they’re safe. Contact the
Technology Support Desk if you’re not sure.

Subject: FORMAL NOTICE: Staged Test Environment & Active Suppression of
Evidence — Claim #42647461

ATTENTION: WorkSafeBC Case Management and Arcose Consulting Group,
1am writing to formally notify all parties that Report ID: 2044-20260306 (Project
No. 2044.20383.2026) is fundamentally flawed, based on a staged test
environment, and reflects a deliberate suppression of forensic data.

As a 25-year heavy industry professional with an honors-level technical
background (3.73 GPA, NAIT), | am submitting the following Evidence of
Administrative and Regulatory Non-Compliance:

1. ACTIVE SUPPRESSION OF THE JAN 29 FORENSIC BRIEF The attached
Acoustic Trauma Brief was filed on January 29, 2026, as part of my formal
WorkSafeBC Unsafe Workplace Report. WorkSafeBC and the Employer failed to
provide this brief to the Arcose investigators. By withholding this forensic data,
the Board ensured the survey would ignore the documented 328Hz narrow-band
resonance ("Acoustic Laser") that caused my injury.

2. THE REGULATORY "HARD STOP": UNPERMITTED INSTALLATION This is
an industrial-scale server deployment in a Classroom/Office environment—not a
machine shop. A forensic audit of 317 municipal records confirms this equipment
was installed without permits, violating NFPA 75/76 standards. This site is
currently under active investigation by the City of Burnaby Building Permit
Supervisor. Labeling an illegal, unpermitted fire hazard as "safe" is a breach of
professional and regulatory duty.

3. THE CONFIGURATION "CATCH-22" (STAGED ASSEMBLY) My acute
acoustic trauma on January 25 occurred because the equipment was operated in a
broken state with a missing side panel, allowing raw mechanical noise to reflect
off the window directly into my left ear. This report is now trapped in a forensic
"Catch-22":

e SCENARIO A (Tested with panels ON): The employer presented a staged
environment. A "sealed" machine does not represent the unshielded state
that injured me.

e SCENARIO B (Tested with panels OFF): You have professionally certified
an unshielded, broken, and unpermitted machine as "safe" for a
classroom environment.

4. MISREPRESENTATION OF CLINICAL TRAUMA The employer and the Board
have framed an acute physical injury as a "subjective distraction." They have
withheld the clinical reality: 5 Emergency Room visits, a documented 10dB
asymmetric hearing drop, and clinical Tonic Tensor Tympani Syndrome
(TTTS). Relying on A-weighted averages to "smooth over" a localized trauma is
scientifically dishonest.

NOTICE OF LIABILITY: WorkSafeBC is currently using a report based on a staged
environment to deny medical care and wages to an injured worker. Now that all
parties have been formally provided with the actual operational state (missing

68B33

(R01/09) Page 3 of 4