EXHIBIT M (2 of 5)

« January 23: First stabbing pain in left ear, lesser pain in right ear. Reported to instructor.
Multi-day migraines began.

+ January 25: Emergency Room visit #1 — Royal Columbian Hospital, 4pm-10pm. Ruled
out infection. No diagnosis. Notified instructor sick day required.

+ January 26: First reportable workplace injury in 25-year heavy industry career. Too
exhausted to attend class. Headaches and ear pain persist.

+ January 27: Refused Workstation 3 on return. Required use of instructor's workstation
with limited simulator access. Even 20 feet from server racks causing ear pain. Wearing
earplugs when practicable.

ACCOUNT OF THEJANUARY 27 MEETING

| requested this meeting specifically to report my ear injury and to ask about escalating within
the company to a formal workplace injury process. The following is an accurate account of the
exchange, to the best of my recollection. A CUPE 7000 union representative, Rabjit Bul, was
present throughout.

Employer's Position on the Safety Concern

Austin Puder informed me that my MyHSE Safety Concern #75625 had been closed. He stated
that sound level measurements had been conducted and the levels were below the 85dB
occupational exposure limit. He cited measurements of approximately 56-63dB.

My Report of Ear Injury

| explicitly reported that | was experiencing stabbing pain in my left ear, and lesser pain in my
right ear, as a direct result of my exposure at Workstation 3. | described this as a workplace
injury — not a noise complaint, not a distraction, but a physical injury causing acute ear pain.

Employer's Response to Reported Injury

Austin Puder responded to my report of ear injury by stating that the sound levels were not high
enough to cause hearing damage. His exact words, to the best of my recollection, were:

| "It's not loud enough to cause hearing damage."
| responded
| "My left ear begs to differ."

Austin Puder then raised the subject of alarm levels in the Control Room, stating that alarms
reach 75dB and suggesting this was relevant context. | countered that alarms are intermittent —