June 22, 2026 ~ placing both organizations on an identical thirty-business-day statutory response clock
under PIPA and FIPPA.

Evidence: Exhibit V— BCRTC Phone Log 1.jpg (May 26, 2026 tracking call). Exhibit W — OIPC/ForeMed/Transtink
privacy complaint correspondence, June 22, 2026.

As with Sectians 2-9, above, no single item here would be dispositive alone. Together, they show BCRTC
representing that a signed consent existed when its own file shows-the consent field blank; using a
financial incentive to move a physician’s office to fax quickly; and then using the resulting file — built ona
form BCRTC’s own hand received unsigned — as the evidentiary foundation for an AWOL designation and
a threat to end’a 2.9-year career. It is the same institutional pattern documented throughout this dossier:

the paper trail, not the underlying safety or medical reality, is what BCRTC appears to have managed at
each point of outside scrutiny.

11. Consolidated Timeline

Date / Time Source

Jan 26, 8:30 AM A. Puder {BCRTC) Emails .N. Gilt proposing to remove’ worker from training program, Exhibit N
labelling his MyHSE safety report.a “vexatious Work Refusal” — on the
worker's first sick day for the injury.

Exhibit O=
Jan 12-29 Mark Stationed at Workstation.3, OMC1 Training Room, next ta two MyHSE #75625
unshielded server racks {missing side panel}.

| nayiise #75625 | #75625

Mar 18, 4:45AM | Mark “FORMAL NOTICE: Staged Test Environment & Active Suppression of Gmail thread
Evidence” sent to WorkSafeBC and Arcose.

City of Burnaby Building inspector attends OMC1 to meet with “Rupert” (Lead Engineer
— Electrical}.

000293