Evidence: Exhibits D & E, FOI Release / “The Name-and Address Shell Game" submission, pp. 3~4.

Neither of these addresses matches OMC1's true-address, and they do not match each other. The worker
submits that this is not the pattern one would expect froma single clerical slip — a genuine.typo tends to
repeat or to be trivially close to the truth. Here, BCRTC produced two separate incorrect addresses for the
same physical room within 24 hours. Because municipal permit records are indexed toa specific legal
address, this practice had.the practical effect of disconnecting any consultant's or investigator's paper trail
fram OMC1's actual (and, on the current record, non-existent) permit history.

4, Photographic Corroboration — The Same Room, Despite the Paper Trail

Independently of the written record in Section 3, photographic evidence confirms that Arcose's
consultants were physically present in the real OMC1 Training.Room — the same room the worker
occupied — regardless of the false addresses BCRTC provided to them in writing.

The worker's own photograph of Workstation 3, taken from inside the training room, shows a distinctive
vertical sliver of daylight visible through a narrow gap at the edge of the window blinds behind the server
racks. A photograph associated with Arcose's own site work shows the identical sliver of light, in the same
position, relative to the same rack and. window — confirming both photographs were taken in the same
physical space.

Photograph 1 — Mark Holand’s photograph of Workstation 2, OMC Training Room. Note the vertical sliver of daylight
visible through the gap at the edge of the window blinds, upper right.

000287

anemia A