1. ACTIVE SUPPRESSION OF THE JAN 29 FORENSIC BRIEF The
attached Acoustic Trauma Brief was filed on January 29, 2026, as
part of my formal WorkSafeBC Unsafe Workplace Report.
WorkSafeBC and the Employer failed to provide this brief to the
Arcose investigators. By withholding this forensic data, the Board
ensured the survey would ignore the documented 328Hz narrow-
band resonance ("Acoustic Laser") that caused my injury.

2. THE REGULATORY "HARD STOP": UNPERMITTED INSTALLATION
This is an industrial-scale server deployment in a Classroom/Office
environment—not a machine shop. A forensic audit of 317 municipal
records confirms this equipment was installed without permits,
violating NFPA 75/76 standards. This site is currently under active
investigation by the City of Burnaby Building Permit Supervisor.
Labeling an illegal, unpermitted fire hazard as "safe" is a breach of
professional and regulatory duty.

3. THE CONFIGURATION "CATCH-22" (STAGED ASSEMBLY) My
acute acoustic trauma on January 25 occurred because the
equipment was operated in a broken state with a missing side
panel, allowing raw mechanical noise to reflect off the window
directly into my left ear. This report is now trapped in a forensic
"Catch-22":

- SCENARIO A (Tested with panels ON): The employer presented
a staged environment. A "sealed" machine does not represent
the unshielded state that injured me.

- SCENARIO B (Tested with panels OFF): You have professionally
certified an unshielded, broken, and unpermitted machine as
"safe" for a classroom environment.

4. MISREPRESENTATION OF CLINICAL TRAUMA The employer and
the Board have framed an acute physical injury as a "subjective

3
000021