← Back
📁 MARK'S DOC
🔗 Linked Evidence
Review_Division_Submission_3_of_3 — p.14
📄 Review Division Submission 3 of 3 | p.14
📄 Review Division Submission 3 of 3 | p.14
📝 Extracted Text (OCR)
Advisor was aware of. The Opinion uses this sensitivity as evidence of a pre-existing condition while not addressing it as context for why a 328 Hz resonance produced the documented clinical severity. Separately, the PTSD and acute psychological symptoms that emerged from February 2026 onward — which the Opinion treats as part of the “pre-existing” picture — did not exist before the January 12, 2026 exposure and are properly understood as sequelae of the injury, not antecedents to it. IV.E Ongoing Treatment and Independent Assessment The worker continues to actively pursue treatment and independent medical assessment in respect of the matters raised in this submission. The worker has the following appointments scheduled: a pain clinic assessment with Dr. Chaudhary on June 29, 2026; a virtual psychiatric consultation with RCH Outpatient Psychiatry on July 13, 2026, to review and coordinate the medication regimen described in Part IV.C; and a further otolaryngology consultation with Dr. Arman Abdalkhani on July 16, 2026. The worker submits that this further otolaryngology consultation is directly relevant to the alternative relief sought in Part VI — namely, an independent otolaryngological opinion addressing the 328 Hz resonance data, the audiometric threshold shift, and the worker's symptom history — and that the outcome of this consultation may be relevant to the Review Division's consideration of this file.